Adam Schiff Caught in False Claim About Wildfires on Live TV, Gets Called Out Watch Video Below👇

Senator Adam Schiff Faces Backlash Over Controversial Remarks on LA Wildfires and Reservoir Maintenance

In the midst of the devastating wildfires that recently swept through Los Angeles, Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) found himself at the center of a heated controversy. During an interview on ABC News, Schiff made statements regarding the role of an inactive reservoir in the Pacific Palisades, which many have since criticized as misleading and potentially damaging. The reservoir, capable of holding a staggering 117 million gallons of water, has been a focal point for those arguing that its maintenance could have provided crucial resources for firefighting efforts. Critics have directed their frustration toward California’s government, accusing it of neglecting essential infrastructure that could have mitigated the disaster’s impact.

Schiff’s Interview on ABC

The tension surrounding the wildfires was palpable, especially when reports emerged highlighting that numerous fire hydrants across Los Angeles were devoid of water. This shortage severely hindered firefighters’ ability to combat the blazes effectively. During an ABC interview, Senator Schiff was directly questioned about this issue. The interviewer pressed him for clarity, asking, “Why did so many of those fire hydrants simply run dry? Was there something to do with that 117 million-gallon reservoir in the Palisades that was out of operation? What’s your understanding? What’s your initial read on this?”

Schiff’s response aimed to downplay the connection between the dry hydrants and the inactive reservoir. He stated, “Well, my initial take, and I certainly want a full review of this so that I can form a more complete understanding of the matter,” before adding, “the reservoirs that the Palisades were drawing on, these 3 million-gallon reservoirs, were full at the initiation of these fires.” He continued to argue that even if the reservoir had been operational, its capacity might not have significantly impacted the firefighting efforts due to the fires’ scale and intensity. “They’re intended, frankly, to put out homes that house maybe multiple families, not to extinguish an entire town if it’s up in flames,” Schiff explained. He emphasized the formidable challenges posed by hurricane-force winds, noting, “The winds were hurricane-force, reaching up to 100 miles per hour; you can’t fly in that, and you depend on being able to do water drops to extinguish those kinds of flames.”

Social Media Reacts

Senator Schiff’s remarks quickly drew backlash from various corners, particularly from conservative circles and concerned citizens. Social media became a battleground for opinions, with many accusing Schiff of misleading the public. A prominent conservative account, “I Meme Therefore I Am,” shared a clip of Schiff’s interview, asserting, “Adam Schiff appeared on national television and misled the American public once again, asserting that the reservoirs ‘were full at the initiation of these fires.’”

Further fueling the criticism, the account referenced a screenshot from an NBC News article titled “Reservoir in Pacific Palisades Was Out of Commission When Fires Started.” This article revealed that the Santa Ynez Reservoir, a 117-million-gallon water storage facility, had been offline for nearly a year due to necessary cover repairs. The reservoir had been empty since February, creating a critical gap in the water supply during the wildfire crisis. This revelation directly contradicted Schiff’s assertion that the reservoirs were full at the onset of the fires.

Governor Newsom Calls for Investigation

In response to the mounting criticism and the revelation about the reservoir’s status, Governor Gavin Newsom of California called for a comprehensive investigation. The governor’s office released a statement emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency regarding the reservoir’s maintenance and its impact on firefighting efforts. “We must understand what went wrong and ensure that our infrastructure is prepared to support emergency response efforts in the future,” Newsom stated.

This call for an investigation underscored the seriousness of the situation and the public’s demand for answers. The inactive Santa Ynez Reservoir became a symbol of broader systemic failures within California’s government, highlighting issues related to infrastructure maintenance and emergency preparedness.

Demands for Accountability

The revelation about the reservoir’s inactivity intensified the public’s demand for accountability. Many Californians expressed frustration over what they perceive as negligence by state officials in maintaining crucial infrastructure. The fact that the Santa Ynez Reservoir had been out of commission for nearly a year raised serious questions about the state’s preparedness for natural disasters.

A Twitter user on the “I Meme Therefore I Am” account elaborated, “A simple Google search indicates that there is an ongoing investigation into the reasons behind the Pacific Palisades reservoir being offline. Furthermore, it reveals that the Santa Ynez Reservoir has been closed since February for cover repairs, leaving it unavailable during this critical time.” This comment not only criticized Schiff but also highlighted the broader issue of infrastructure oversight.

Infrastructure and Disaster Preparedness

The controversy surrounding Senator Schiff’s comments touches on a much larger issue: the state of infrastructure and disaster preparedness in California. The wildfires that ravaged Los Angeles exposed vulnerabilities in the city’s emergency response systems, particularly the reliance on fire hydrants that were unexpectedly dry. The inactivity of a key reservoir like Santa Ynez only compounded these challenges, leaving firefighters without a critical resource needed to combat the flames effectively.

Experts argue that maintaining and upgrading infrastructure is essential for effective disaster response. Reservoirs, water storage facilities, and fire hydrants are integral components of a city’s firefighting arsenal. Their proper maintenance ensures that resources are available when natural disasters strike, potentially saving lives and property.

Schiff’s Defense and Ongoing Debate

Senator Schiff’s defense of his initial statements has done little to quell the backlash. By downplaying the significance of the inactive reservoir, Schiff has been criticized for diverting attention away from what many see as a preventable disaster. Critics argue that his comments reflect a broader trend of political figures deflecting responsibility and not addressing systemic issues head-on.

In an attempt to mitigate the damage, Schiff reiterated his commitment to a full review of the situation. However, many believe that his initial response was insufficient and failed to address the core issue of infrastructure maintenance. The debate continues to rage, with both sides digging in their heels and demanding different levels of accountability.

Erosion or Reaffirmation?

The controversy has had a significant impact on public trust, particularly towards political leaders responsible for disaster preparedness and infrastructure maintenance. For many Californians, the wildfires have been a wake-up call about the importance of maintaining critical resources. The revelation about the inactive Santa Ynez Reservoir has only deepened concerns about whether state officials are doing enough to prevent such disasters.

For supporters of Senator Schiff, his remarks might be seen as an attempt to explain complex issues rather than an outright admission of negligence. They argue that the scale of the wildfires was unprecedented and that no single resource could have completely mitigated the disaster. However, critics view his statements as a blatant attempt to shift blame and avoid responsibility for the systemic failures that contributed to the crisis.

The Path to Resolution

As the dust begins to settle from the wildfires, the focus is shifting towards understanding what went wrong and how to prevent similar disasters in the future. The investigation called for by Governor Newsom aims to shed light on the factors that led to the reservoir’s inactivity and the subsequent shortage of water for firefighting efforts.

Key areas of focus include:

  • Infrastructure Maintenance: Ensuring that all critical water storage facilities and fire hydrants are operational and adequately maintained.
  • Emergency Preparedness: Developing robust plans that account for various disaster scenarios, including extreme weather conditions and widespread fires.
  • Resource Allocation: Prioritizing funding and resources for infrastructure projects that can enhance the city’s resilience against natural disasters.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Holding responsible parties accountable for lapses in maintenance and preparedness, fostering a culture of transparency within the government.

Related Posts

THEY TOLD US HE DIED IN THE LINE OF DUTY—BUT HIS DOG KNEW BETTER Nobody could get Rex to move. He stood like a statue at the casket, paw resting on the edge, nose pressed to the wood like he was waiting for a signal. One last command. Something to explain why the voice he knew better than his own heartbeat had suddenly gone silent. Officer Grant was the best handler on the force. Everybody said so. Clean record, sharp instincts, calm under pressure. And he loved that dog like it was family. No—more than family. So when they said it was a “routine traffic stop gone bad,” none of us questioned it. Not out loud, anyway. But Rex didn’t believe it. You could see it in the way he sniffed the edges of the casket, searching—not for closure, but for proof. For something that made sense. I was standing a few rows back when the dog did something strange. He stepped back. Looked directly at the guy holding his leash. Then growled. Low. Quiet. But unmistakable. The leash officer froze. You don’t ignore a K9 when it reacts like that. And then, as the priest kept speaking, I saw what Rex saw. A patch of tan fabric stuck to the sole of a man’s shoe. Right in the front row. Civilian clothes. No badge. No tears. Just watching like he was waiting for it to be over. Rex growled again. And this time, I saw the patch too. It had a bloodstain. And three letters barely visible under the smear: “IA—” ⬇️ (continue reading in the first cᴑmment)

Nobody could get Rex to move. He stood like a statue at the casket, paw resting on the edge, nose pressed to the wood like he was…

HE BUYS HER THE SAME ROSES EVERY WEEK—EVEN THOUGH SHE DOESN’T REMEMBER WHY We saw him every Thursday around 3pm. Same motorized cart. Same yellow JEGS hat. And always—always—the same bouquet of red roses in the basket. He’d roll straight past the deli, turn into the floral section, pick the fullest bunch, and sniff them like it still meant something. My coworker Kira asked him once, “Special occasion today?” He just smiled and said, “Not today. Just Thursday.” That week, I decided to follow him out—just curious. He loaded his groceries into a beige sedan with shaky hands. Took his time, wiped the dashboard like it mattered, then opened the passenger door. That’s when I saw her. She looked elegant even in a worn cardigan. Gray hair pulled back with a velvet ribbon. Eyes wide and blank, like she was somewhere else entirely. He handed her the roses without a word. She looked at them like she’d never seen a flower before. Then smiled. “Are these from the man who used to bring me flowers?” she asked. He paused for half a second. Then nodded. “Yeah, sweetheart. Every Thursday.” He kissed her forehead and helped her buckle in. I stood there watching like a fool, heart in my throat. And I couldn’t stop thinking about how much it must hurt—being remembered as a stranger by the person who once knew everything about you. But the next week? He came back. Same time. Same hat. Same roses. Only this time, he grabbed a second bouquet too. And tucked a note into that one. I saw it slip out as he turned the cart—folded, handwritten, with just three words showing: “In case she…”⬇️

We saw him every Thursday around 3pm. Same motorized cart. Same yellow JEGS hat. And always—always—the same bouquet of red roses in the basket. He’d roll straight…

HE RETURNED HER TRASH CAN EVERY WEEK—BUT TODAY, SOMETHING WAS DIFFERENT It was just another morning. Another trash pickup. But then I saw him—the same sanitation worker I’d noticed before. He didn’t just empty the can and leave. He carefully wheeled it all the way back to the side door of the small brick house, just like he always did. No rush. No hesitation. Just quiet kindness. Curious, I approached the elderly woman sitting on her porch. She smiled softly. “That man? He’s been doing that for me every week,” she said. “Since my husband passed, I can’t bring it back myself.” I glanced back at him, feeling something heavy settle in my chest. But then I noticed… he wasn’t heading back to the truck right away. He just stood there, staring at the house. Something was wrong. And the moment I realized why—my stomach dropped.⬇️ (continue reading in the first cᴑmment)

It was just another morning. Another trash pickup. But then I saw him—the same sanitation worker I’d noticed before. He didn’t just empty the can and leave….

Many people don’t know what its purpose is used for 🤔 but now that I know, I don’t know if I wanted to know 👇😅 check in comms:

The brightly colored fabric strip may appear pointless at first, and visitors frequently take it off for comfort. In addition to complete sets of pillows, blankets, and…

I ADOPTED A 4-YEAR-OLD BOY—ALL SEEMED PERFECT UNTIL HE SHOWED ME HIS DRAWING I always dreamed of having kids, but life didn’t go the way I planned. After years of hoping and waiting, I realized maybe my path was meant to be different. That’s when I met Joey, a little boy who needed a home just as much as I needed him. From the moment he reached for my hand, I knew I was finally a mom. A week after Joey moved in, I planned his FIRST REAL BIRTHDAY. I wanted it to feel special—balloons, pancakes, presents carefully picked out just for him. We laughed in the kitchen, making a total mess, and for a moment, I thought he finally felt safe. But when he opened his gift, his smile faded. By the time we sat down with the cake, HE WASN’T EVEN LOOKING AT ME! Just staring at the candle like it wasn’t real… I nudged the plate toward him, waiting for that little spark of joy. Instead, he looked up, eyes full of something I couldn’t place. And that’s when he said it, quiet but sharp enough to break me: “My birthday was YESTERDAY.” “But… the documents say it’s today,” I whispered. “They made a MISTAKE. It’s my brother’s…” he answered. My heart stopped. “Wait. Your BROTHER??” He was silent for a moment, then finally added, “YOU HAVE TO SEE SOMETHING.” Then, he reached under his pillow and pulled out a small wooden box. He opened it and took out a folded piece of paper, handing it to me. I looked at it… and oh my God! ⬇

My adopted son stared at his birthday cake in silence. Then, tears rolled down his cheeks. “My birthday was yesterday,” he whispered. My stomach dropped—the documents said today. What…

After going through numerous challenges, Carrie Underwood and her husband decided to move to a farm.. (check in first comment👇)

Carrie Underwood, having grown up on a farm, developed a love for gardening and organic living. She considers her garden a “happy place” where she can reflect….